Local Paper Front Page–Is Boeing in trouble in South Carolina?

Boeing Co.’s $750 million aircraft plant in North Charleston is at the heart of a growing labor rift pitting the aerospace giant against one of its biggest unions and now a federal agency.

The National Labor Relations Board sued the company Wednesday, saying Boeing shifted some of its 787 Dreamliner production to South Carolina partly to retaliate against the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers for past strikes in Washington state.

The NLRB is seeking a court order that would require Boeing to maintain its second 787 assembly line in the Pacific Northwest, an IAMAW stronghold. If successful, that could stop Boeing from building the plane in North Charleston.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Economics, Politics, * South Carolina, Corporations/Corporate Life, Economy, Labor/Labor Unions/Labor Market

4 comments on “Local Paper Front Page–Is Boeing in trouble in South Carolina?

  1. BlueOntario says:

    I think Boeing is just using unions as a distraction to protect itself from something bigger. Of greater importance than who-works-where-for-how-much may be whether the money South Carolina gave to Boeing to entice it to move its production to that state can be considered a subsidy. The WTO has [url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704254304576116051390545350.html]ruled unfavorably[/url] over similar things.

    BTW, for those with a lot of time on their hands, the 800 page WTO panel report may be found [url=http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds353_e.htm]here[/url].

  2. Sarah says:

    Hey — the unions gambled — and lost.

    I’m sure it’s irritating to just have a company pick up those jobs and transfer them to a state with plenty of workers that aren’t unionized.

  3. Branford says:

    From Hot Air (they also have a link to a WSJ article on this):

    … The government has no legitimate role in forcing business owners to be hostages to their workforce. If the workers price themselves out of their jobs, then they need to deal with the consequences. The ability to collectively bargain does not include a guarantee of a job.

    Otherwise, we all pay higher prices for the same product or service — and for Boeing, which competes against the EU’s Airbus, it will mean lost sales and less work altogether in the US. Prices of flying will increase, while the taxes that flow from both employment and sales will decrease. Nor will it end there. Such a decision will lock businesses in their present locations and give local and state governments carte blanche to hike taxes and fees, secure that business owners won’t be able to vote with their feet — and leave taxpayers holding the bag when businesses go under and capital stops flowing to the US for investment.

  4. evan miller says:

    Just another instance of the socialists in the Federal Government at work rewarding their union allies at the expense of job-creating businesses.