(NYT) Jonathan Mahler–When ”˜Long-Form’ Is Bad Form

[Around mid-January]… the sports and pop culture website Grantland published a story called “Dr. V’s Magical Putter” ”” a piece of “long-form,” as we now call multi-thousand-word, narrative-driven reported articles ”” about a woman named Essay Anne Vanderbilt, who claimed to have invented a golf putter of unsurpassed excellence.

Over the course of 7,000-plus words, the writer, Caleb Hannan, devoted a lot of space to the contentious relationship he had developed with his subject. Ms. Vanderbilt, who was transgender but in the closet ”” and also probably a con artist ”” didn’t like Mr. Hannan’s digging into the details of her personal and professional life. In the final few paragraphs of the story, Mr. Hannan revealed some shocking news: Ms. Vanderbilt had killed herself.

The piece was initially met with praise from across the Internet. (“Great read,” raved a typical Tweet. “Fascinating, bizarre,” read another.) Then the criticism started. Mr. Hannan was accused of everything from being grossly insensitive to Ms. Vanderbilt’s privacy to having played a role in her suicide. The controversy soon grew so intense that the editor of the site, Bill Simmons, felt compelled to address it in an apologetic, if defensive, 2,700-word post of his own. Mr. Simmons stressed that the decision to publish the piece had not been taken lightly and that somewhere between 13 and 15 people had read it before it was posted and had all been “blown away.”

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Culture-Watch, --Social Networking, Anthropology, Blogging & the Internet, Media, Psychology, Sports, Theology

One comment on “(NYT) Jonathan Mahler–When ”˜Long-Form’ Is Bad Form

  1. BlueOntario says:

    You are not, never, ever to mention the emperor’s new clothes, especially with lots of words.

    It is a shame, saddening, that Hannan’s piece is not one of fiction. Mental health issues are saddening things, not that one would know that is what all the angst and finger pointing is really about. Perhaps the author could have pared down what he knew to a more vague summary that “Dr. V” and the putter had issues, but would there still be content enough to point out problems the author saw? Would a super-reductionist short-form article as suggested, simply stating “Caveat emptor,” have given Mahler his literary bread?