A group of Church of England Bishops issue an open letter on Brexit

Seeing the evidence of division in every part of England, we are deeply concerned about:

  • Political polarisation and language that appears to sanction hate crime: the reframing of the language of political discourse is urgent, especially given the abuse and threats levelled at MPs doing their job.
  • The ease with which lies can be told and misrepresentation encouraged: leaders must be honest about the costs of political choices, especially for those most vulnerable.
  • The levels of fear, uncertainty and marginalisation in society, much of which lies behind the vote for Brexit, but will not be addressed by Brexit: poor people, EU citizens in the UK and UK citizens in Europe must be listened to and respected.
  • The Irish border is not a mere political totem and peace in Ireland is not a ball to be kicked by the English: respect for the concerns on both sides of the border is essential.
  • The sovereignty of Parliament is not just an empty term, it is based on institutions to be honoured and respected: our democracy is endangered by cavalier disregard for these.
  • Attention must be paid not only to the Union, but also to the meaning of Englishness.

Read it all.

print

Posted in Church of England (CoE), CoE Bishops, England / UK, Ethics / Moral Theology, Foreign Relations, Politics in General

2 comments on “A group of Church of England Bishops issue an open letter on Brexit

  1. Pageantmaster ن‎ says:

    Jesus was a remainer – who knew?

    How lucky we are to have our wise Guardian-reading bishops to tell us on what to think, what opinions to have and who to vote for.

    A grateful sheeps

    Baa

  2. Pageantmaster ن‎ says:

    ..the reframing of the language of political discourse is urgent.

    I see

    we are deeply concerned about…The ease with which lies can be told and misrepresentation encouraged: leaders must be honest about the costs of political choices…

    How exactly will calling leaders liars, misrepresenters and dishonest reframe the language of political discourse?