Unfortunately, America is tiring of its role as guarantor of the liberal order. The giant has not exactly fallen asleep again, but its resolve is faltering and its enemies are testing it. Vladimir Putin is massing troops on the border with Ukraine and could soon invade. China is buzzing Taiwan\u2019s airspace with fighter jets, using mock-ups of American aircraft-carriers for target practice and trying out hypersonic weapons. Iran has taken such a maximalist stance at nuclear talks that many observers expect them to collapse. Thus, two autocratic powers threaten to seize land currently under democratic control, and a third threatens to violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty by building a nuclear bomb. How far would America go to prevent such reckless acts?<\/p>\n
Joe Biden can sound forceful, at times. On December 7th he warned Mr Putin of severe consequences if Russia were to launch another attack on Ukraine. He has maintained sanctions on Iran. And in October he said that America had a \u201ccommitment\u201d to defend Taiwan, though aides insisted policy has not changed. (America has long refused to say whether it would send forces to repel a Chinese invasion, so as not to encourage any Taiwanese action that might provoke one.) China was left wondering whether Mr Biden misspoke or was craftily hinting at a more robust stance. On December 7th America\u2019s House of Representatives passed a big boost to the defence budget. Also this week Mr Biden was to hold a \u201cSummit for Democracy\u201d, to encourage countries that respect the rules to club together.<\/p>\n
And yet, as our Briefing explains, America has become reluctant to use hard power across much of the world. <\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n What would America fight for?@TheEconomist<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/FqoaibxLaz<\/a><\/p>\n — rubeneus (@rubenanguiano) December 11, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \n