Ron\u2019s loyalty was to Scripture. He was no more radical than John Wesley or Charles Finney (and certainly far less radical than Saint Anthony and Saint Francis).<\/p>\n
As I once pointed out to him, he was much more conciliatory than the biblical figures of Amos; Jeremiah; John the Baptist (Luke 3:11); and, most important of all, the Lord Jesus, who said we cannot be his disciples unless we surrender all our possessions (Luke 12:33; 14:33).<\/p>\n
Although Ron was often associated with the evangelical Left, he remained consistently pro-life and insisted that the church should maintain biblical sexual ethics. I\u2019m pretty sure that he and I didn\u2019t always vote the same way, despite our agreement on ethics, but I never doubted that his vote was informed by his biblical conscience.<\/p>\n
In conversation, I found him ready to embrace what he saw as the best solutions from either side of today\u2019s (tragically polarized) political aisle, and he maintained contacts on both sides of that split. He always remained the consistent evangelical Anabaptist that he was\u2014living simply and sacrificially and working on behalf of the needy. The 2013 book of essays dedicated in his honor is fittingly titled Following Jesus<\/a>: Journeys in Radical Discipleship<\/span>.<\/p>\n Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n From CTmagazine: An advocate for the environment. An opponent of apartheid. Consistently pro-life. Concerned for the poor.<\/p>\n In memory of Ron Sider, who spoke to evangelicals about social justice & the mainline church about evangelism: https:\/\/t.co\/oQ4JNJxjvs<\/a><\/p>\n — Carol Flohr Giles (@giles_carol) August 2, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \n