…she saw the monarchy as something larger than herself, something to which her personal interests had to be subordinated.<\/p>\n
Some of this was no doubt due to her quiet but serious Christian faith. A friend who once had the privilege of being a royal chaplain and spending a weekend at Balmoral Castle confirmed that the conversations he had with the queen revealed her to be a thoughtful, devout Christian. As a humble Christian she took her earthly vocation seriously, placing the needs of the office and of the people she ruled before her own.<\/p>\n
Unlike most heads of state today, she was a person to whom one could point and say to one’s children and grandchildren, \u201cWhen you grow up, you want to be like her.\u201d Her reign was marked with a deep sense of the dignity of her office. She never used profane language. She never sneered at critics. A generation raised on reality TV, life-as-performance, confected Twitter outrage, and \u201cliving loud\u201d would do well to reflect upon that. To how many other executives of the past decades can one point as a good example to follow? Maybe that is why monarchy might not be such a bad thing after all. Democratically-elected leaders often achieve their positions thanks to ruthless ambition, dirty tricks, and an overwhelming sense of their own vital importance. The queen was never burdened with such temptations, and it showed.<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n A favourite photo the Queen and Prince Philip. pic.twitter.com\/ntUfe1FixU<\/a><\/p>\n — Mark Fox (@MarkFoxNews) September 8, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \n