The F-16, with its longer-range radars, sensors and missiles, would restore the Ukrainian air force\u2019s edge both qualitatively and quantitatively \u2014 and push the VKS back into Russia. That will, in turn, protect both Ukraine\u2019s ground forces and its critical infrastructure. But boosting its effectiveness in the absence of wider air power packaging will require imagination.<\/p>\n
Integrated air defence systems work far better than those operating in isolation. The Ukrainian air force must link together its western surface-to-air missiles and their advanced radars to provide its pilots with an enhanced picture of the aerial battle. Ground-based electronic warfare systems can do much to degrade Russian radars, and thereby its surface-to-air missile belt. Using rapidly-prototyped drones in reconnaissance and suppressing enemy air defence missions would make Russia\u2019s fighter aircraft more vulnerable. This package of largely ground-based supporting systems \u2014 much cheaper than airborne ones \u2014 would allow Ukraine to retain the initiative in the air battle.<\/p>\n
Finally, there is a moral dimension to consider. Nato would fight Russia by winning the air battle first, and then using air superiority to drive a more efficient land battle. Given the weakness of the VKS, this is no pipe dream. But the west\u2019s constrained donations to date have forced Ukraine to pursue grinding land tactics. We have restricted Kyiv to fighting in a way that we would not, and to take casualties that we would not.<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n Our taboo on giving aircraft to Ukraine made the war longer and deadlier. New European and US initiatives to help Ukrainians secure their own skies will save lives and shorten the war.https:\/\/t.co\/4B8r815gWG<\/a><\/p>\n — Timothy Snyder (@TimothyDSnyder) May 26, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \n