Jesus\u2019 view of marriage as between a man and a woman was entirely typical of first-century Judaism, and consistent with the rest of Scripture. All ancient cultures (and many modern ones) recognised that a small minority of the population were different, in having a settled attraction to those of the same sex. In the ancient world, marriage and procreation were seen as key to the survival of society, so such people could be perceived as a threat, but there was often some sort of provision made for them. The Old Testament is unique amongst Ancient Near Eastern texts in not doing so\u2014on the basis of God\u2019s creation of male and female as the basis for sexual relationships. That is why all mainstream, critical scholars agree that the biblical texts and the teaching of Jesus is clear and consistent\u2014though many of them think it is wrong.<\/p>\n
Where the Bible mentions homosexual behavior at all, it clearly condemns it. I freely grant that. The issue is precisely whether that Biblical judgment is correct (Walter Wink, \u201cHomosexuality and the Bible\u201d).<\/p>\n
The task demands intellectual honesty. I have little patience with efforts to make Scripture say something other than what it says, through appeals to linguistic or cultural subtleties. The exegetical situation is straightforward: we know what the text says. But what are we to\u00a0do\u00a0with what the text says?\u00a0 I think it important to state clearly that we do, in fact, reject the straightforward commands of Scripture, and appeal instead to another authority when we declare that same-sex unions can be holy and good (Luke Timothy Johnson<\/a>).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
It is common to hear people claim \u2018Jesus never said anything about homosexuality\u2019. But he did not need to\u2014just as he did not need to say anything about incest, or other specific aspects of sexual immorality, since there was a clear consensus in Judaism on these questions, rooted in the sexual prohibitions in Leviticus.\u00a0Jesus was concerned about issues of sexual immorality<\/a>, and his reference to\u00a0porneia<\/em>\u00a0would have been heard by anyone listening to him as including same-sex sex within that category of immorality.<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\nThis is a good article from Ian Paul explaining why there's no 'agree to disagree' really possible on this debate. https:\/\/t.co\/mn7buCOGPf<\/a><\/p>\n
— Trevin Wax (@TrevinWax) June 26, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n