…there is one reason why America\u2019s crackdown is justified. TikTok has evolved into a broad media platform with 170m users in America alone. A third of American adults under 30 consider TikTok a source not just of entertainment but of news. It is therefore a real concern that it has links to China, whose government is in deep ideological conflict with the West and sees the media as a tool of propaganda.<\/p>\n
Most countries place some restrictions on foreign ownership of old media (ask Rupert Murdoch, who became an American citizen before taking over Fox). A bid by Abu Dhabi\u2019s ruling family for the Telegraph newspaper prompted Britain to announce this week that it will ban foreign governments from owning British publications. Yet TikTok is fast becoming more influential.<\/p>\n
It is time for governments to apply the same logic to new media as they do to old. If anything, the new platforms require greater vigilance. A newspaper\u2019s editorial line can be seen in black and white; by contrast, every TikTok user gets a different feed, and the company does not provide adequate tools to examine its output in aggregate. Even if studies suggest bias\u2014some allege a skew in TikTok\u2019s Gaza coverage, for instance\u2014it is impossible to know whether TikTok\u2019s algorithm is responding to users\u2019 preferences, or to manipulation from Beijing.<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n The best outcome is one in which TikTok survives. But that requires separating such a prominent platform from the influence of a country as manipulative and ideological as China https:\/\/t.co\/GfNCoDEGZm<\/a> 👇<\/p>\n — The Economist (@TheEconomist) March 13, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \n