In summary, almost everything of substance that the Archbishop says about PLF in the quotation above (apart from \u201cthe church is deeply split over this\u201d) is demonstrably either false or misleading unless the previous explanations and commitments offered by him and the bishops to General Synod are false or misleading. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Archbishop\u2019s interview gives the impression that the Church of England, with the agreement of the majority of bishops, now teaches that sexual relationships, including same-sex sexual relationships, are acceptable as long as the couple are in a committed relationship, either a civil partnership or a marriage. Furthermore, he claims that the Church of England will provide a service of prayer and blessing in church for couples in such relationships. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In fact, the theological argument presented by the bishops (and sight of the legal advice to bishops might demonstrate that this is also crucial for PLF\u2019s legality) has been that any sexual relationship other than marriage between a man and a woman is contrary to the Church\u2019s doctrine of marriage. Despite this, it has nevertheless been claimed by the majority of bishops that any committed same-sex couple (with or without a legal status) can be offered PLF as prayers within an existing authorised liturgy. This is even though it is also acknowledged that because their relationship may be sexual, such prayers are indicative of a departure from the church\u2019s doctrine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Archbishop\u2019s answer might have been \u201cbetter\u201d in the sense of probably being more appealing to Alastair Campbell. It is, however, in fact so highly misleading and inaccurate as to suggest a disturbing level of some combination of ignorance, misrepresentation, dishonesty and inaccuracy on the Archbishop\u2019s part in his account of the church\u2019s recent decisions, its doctrine, and its stated rationale for PLF. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our dire situation as a church is bad enough as a result of having been so divided because of the direction set by the Archbishops and most of the bishops. The fact that there are such deep theological disagreements on these matters that need to be addressed cannot and must not be avoided. However, such significantly erroneous statements as these from no less than the Archbishop of Canterbury, unless swiftly followed by an apology and correction, can only add further to the widespread erosion of trust and growing sense of disbelief, betrayal, deception, anger and despair now felt across much of the Church of England in relation to both the PLF process and our archiepiscopal leadership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p><\/p> The Archbishop of Canterbury has now made claims about the debate on sexuality and the Church's teaching which are demonstrably untrue. Why has he done this, and what will be the impact on trust, the unity of the Church, and the future of the debate?https:\/\/t.co\/Falt0kuP5Q<\/a><\/p>— Dr Ian Paul (@Psephizo) October 15, 2024<\/a><\/blockquote>