In a statement to The Times, a spokesperson for the EHRC said: \u201cThis topic raises complex issues relevant to equality and human rights, and therefore our regulatory remit given the EHRC\u2019s statutory powers and duties. As such, we have provided advice to the chair of the working group and the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government and stand ready to continue to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cLegal protections against discrimination and hate crime already exist, so it is unclear what role a new definition would play in addressing discrimination and abuse targeted at Muslims. An official non-statutory definition risks being in conflict with existing legal definitions and provisions, resulting in inconsistency and potential confusion for courts and individuals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cShould government proceed with adoption of a definition, we advise that this should be subject to a full public consultation so that all the potential risks and benefits can be considered.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A spokesperson for the communities department said that a full consultation was not necessary under the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Read it all<\/a> (requires subscription).<\/p> Islamophobia definition risks breaking the law, watchdog says https:\/\/t.co\/OMabIwC21R<\/a><\/p>— Times Politics (@timespolitics) October 21, 2025<\/a><\/blockquote>