I challenge those Catholics and Protestants who use the term \u201cpelvic theology\u201d to expand the logic of their position to other areas. Take the law, for example. The fact that the law treats sexual crimes in a qualitatively different way to other assaults reflects what is perhaps one of the last moral intuitions still common in Western societies. A punch to the face, however damaging, will be treated as less heinous than sexual assault when it comes to prosecution and penalty. Why? Taking the logic of the \u201cpelvic theology\u201d critics, we might conclude that this is because the culture of making and enforcing laws in the West is dominated by sex-obsessed cranks pushing for \u201cpelvic justice.\u201d Therefore, if you use the term \u201cpelvic theology,\u201d you must also use \u201cpelvic justice.\u201d To refuse to do so is to give the game away: You are not using the term to make a serious point about the metaphysics of the body; you are performing as a useful idiot for the sexual revolutionaries who have wreaked such havoc on our societies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The alternative to such politically selective rhetoric is to acknowledge the reality that underlies both the justice and the theology: Sex is not one human act among others but touches the heart of what it means to be human. The sexual constitution of the body is central to who we are, such that behavior involving such\u2014whether criminal, consensual, or consequential\u2014carries unique significance. To trivialize it, theologically or judicially, is to trivialize humanity itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p> Pelvic Theology, Pelvic Justice
Carl R. Trueman on \u201cpelvic theology,\u201d sexual ethics, and why sex remains central to what it means to be human.
Full piece available at https:\/\/t.co\/RKQBRXa26s<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/Q4OJLtVRtU<\/a><\/p>— First Things (@firstthingsmag) June 5, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>