One should be clear that objections to the Covenant that have been articulated in the past weeks represent entrenched strategic interests, not without principled motivation, but nonetheless driven by worries over maintaining particular stakes in the church\u2019s decision-making process. The fact that objectors openly admit that the text of the Covenant itself is irrelevant to their concerns \u201d\u201c they rarely cite its actual words or argue on their basis \u201d\u201c disclose the nature of their anxieties as lying elsewhere. The Covenant has become a symbol. But if so, a symbol of what? Onto its screen has been projected the ideologies of one after another group.<\/p>\n
But the Synod needs to do its own projecting. What can it see? If it cannot see an image of the Church of England\u2019s own life and calling in the Covenant\u2019s discussion of Christian communion, common commitments, and mutual deference and accountabilities \u201d\u201c a discussion derived from several hundred years of shared ministry and a rich ecumenical service and desire \u201d\u201c then the Church of England will indeed have chosen to stand still, as other Anglicans move forward with a life that promises to go far deeper and more vibrantly into Christ\u2019s purposes than what is left behind.<\/p>\n