Williams did however say in his interview that, because of growing demands, \u201cI suspect it will be necessary, in the next 10 to 15 years, to think about how that load is spread; to think whether in addition to the Archbishop of Canterbury there needs to be some more presidential figure who can travel more readily\u201d\u009d, who \u201chas the support of the primates of the Anglican Communion\u201d\u009d and \u201cwould have an executive role to implement what they decide\u201d\u009d.<\/p>\n
There are echoes of the controversial Covenant he had pushed for which would have bolstered the power of the primates over provinces other than their own, threatening \u201crelational consequences\u201d\u009d for those which failed to obey. This was rejected by the majority of dioceses in the Church of England and elsewhere, but it would appear that another drive for ‘unity’ is planned.<\/p>\n
However, most of the overseas archbishops who have pushed hardest for disciplinary structures would be highly resistant to any interference in their own provinces, a recipe for further splits if any ‘president’ did not entirely do their bidding. Having an international leader could also be disastrous for the Church of England, already facing a sizeable drop in involvement in recent decades.<\/p>\n