{"id":39288,"date":"2013-07-30T00:15:00","date_gmt":"2013-07-30T00:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/127.0.0.1\/site\/2017\/2\/1985\/rod_dreher-anglican_nominalism_as_anglican_comprehensiveness\/"},"modified":"2013-07-30T00:15:00","modified_gmt":"2013-07-30T00:15:00","slug":"rod_dreher-anglican_nominalism_as_anglican_comprehensiveness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=39288","title":{"rendered":"Rod Dreher&#8211;Anglican Nominalism As \u201d\u02dcAnglican Comprehensiveness\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When I read the transgender Episcopal priest praising \u201cAnglican comprehensiveness\u201d\u009d because (in part) it allows for transgender priests, I think that whatever this is, it\u2019s not Christian, except in name. I think Frederica was exactly right when she wrote those words back in the 1990s: \u201cnot a common faith, but common words about the faith \u201d\u201d mere flimsy words.\u201d\u009d Trust me when I say that I don\u2019t mean this combatively, but I genuinely don\u2019t understand how a church with such radically (= at the roots) contradictory ideas about God, sexuality, and the human person can hold together. I\u2019m not trying to insult Anglicans, so please, readers, don\u2019t take this either as an insult or as an invitation to do that. It\u2019s just that reading a transgender priest praise \u201cAnglican comprehensiveness\u201d\u009d as license to \u201cembody ambiguity\u201d\u009d \u201d\u201d well, it puts the theological chasm in sharp perspective.<\/p>\n<p>I have dear friends who are faithful Anglican Christians, and who are surely better Christians than I am. I am not questioning the integrity of the faith of individual Anglicans. What I\u2019m trying to express is my utter bafflement at how this works at the corporate level. It\u2019s particularly on my mind this afternoon because for Orthodox Christians worshiping in the Slavic tradition, today was the Sunday of the Fathers Of The First Six Ecumenical Councils.  We heard a great sermon this morning about why the concept of orthodoxy (right belief) is so important, and how very much depends on it. It\u2019s not so much that I reject a church that can welcome transgender clergy (though I do), but that I do not understand how that can remotely be squared with Scripture and tradition \u201d\u201d with, in a word, fundamental Christian orthodoxy. And more to the point of this post, I don\u2019t understand how Anglicans who do profess fundamental creedal Christian orthodoxy remain in communion with the Episcopal Church. I mean, I know they do, because my friends are good and faithful people, and they do. Still, reading that interview just now was jarring, really jarring, and brought all this to mind. <b>There really is no sexual innovation that the Episcopal Church will not embrace. The only orthodoxy, it appears to this outsider, is banning Christian orthodoxy on sexual matters.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/dreher\/anglican-comprehensiveness-nominalism\">Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When I read the transgender Episcopal priest praising \u201cAnglican comprehensiveness\u201d\u009d because (in part) it allows for transgender priests, I think that whatever this is, it\u2019s not Christian, except in name. I think Frederica was exactly right when she wrote those<span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=39288\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":794,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,39,175,66,168,108,112,34,169],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anglican-episcopal","category-culture-watch","category-anthropology","category-episcopal-church-tec","category-ethics-moral-theology","category-religion-culture","category-sexuality","category-theology","category-theology-scripture"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/794"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=39288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39288\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=39288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=39288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=39288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}