The case now before the court may not be decided on the issue of whether local citizens who must go before a city council to conduct business should be forced to listen to an opening prayer. The justices treat adults differently from school children in many church-state issues. And the town has not censored the prayers or barred anyone from giving them.<\/p>\n
Rather the court may focus on the lower court\u2019s attempt to analyze the prayers on whether they used \u201cgenerically theistic terms\u201d\u009d or refer to a deity as male. The lower court found most of the prayers to be too Christian and thus impose one faith on the citizenry….<\/p>\n
The high court\u2019s history hints that it will rule in favor of the city council, recognizing that prayer is too private for public control or official definition. Courts can serve justice better if they are silent about the nature of prayer \u201d\u201c and the power of prayer in individual lives.<\/p>\n