It\u2019s time to make a clear distinction between the government-enforced legal regime of marriage and the biblical covenant of marriage. In the past, the state recognized marriage, giving it legal forms to reinforce its historic norms. Now the courts have redefined rather than recognized marriage, making it an institution entirely under the state\u2019s control. That\u2019s why it\u2019s now time to stop speaking of civil marriage and instead talk about government marriage\u201d\u201dcalling it what it is.<\/p>\n
As the legal reality of marriage changes, we must also act. If the churches continue as if nothing has changed, the message is that for all our strong words nothing really decisive is at stake. It\u2019s now time, then, to think long and hard about what we need to do\u201d\u201dor refuse to do.<\/p>\n
I can\u2019t see how a priest or pastor can in good conscience sign a marriage license for \u201cSpouse A\u201d\u009d and \u201cSpouse B.\u201d\u009d Perhaps he should strike those absurdities and write \u201cHusband\u201d\u009d and \u201cWife.\u201d\u009d Failing that he should simply refuse the government\u2019s delegation of legal power, referring the couple to the courthouse after the wedding for the state to confect in its bureaucratic way the amorphous and ill-defined civil union that our regime continues to call \u201cmarriage.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n