Today\u2019s counterculture speaks with the voice of tradition, virtue, and religious commitment. There are now more than thirty LFN student groups from colleges across the United States (and Mexico). They uphold the idea that sex comes after marriage, that marriage is between a man and a woman, and that the natural family is the irreducible foundation of all civil societal associations. Like the \u201960s radicals, they refuse to keep quiet. Yet unlike the \u201960s radicals, they refuse with civility. They carry themselves with decorum and respect. The manner of their actions corresponds to the content of their ideas: unabashedly witnessing to the truth of marriage, sex, and the family.<\/p>\n
I know from personal experience that being countercultural means dealing with insults, contempt, exclusion. My peers prod and jeer, and the authorities regard as troublesome. They act on the underlying cultural assumption at public universities, which is, \u201cYou\u2019re innocent until proven conservative.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
When I once said something favorable about traditional marriage, one friend said to me, \u201cGet out of your patriarchal circle,\u201d\u009d while another terminated the conversation because my \u201cvery existence offends\u201d\u009d her. I remember attending a university performance of vignettes whose subject had to do with sex (reflecting the level of wit among my peers), with one skit about students at a school known as \u201cOur Lady of Perpetual Repression.\u201d\u009d It felt like some quasi-religious ceremony in which a phantom group of social conservatives were displayed like Guy Fawkes puppets to be burned in effigy.<\/p>\n