Neuhaus sympathized with [many so-called ‘conservatives’] grievances\u201d\u201dover abortion and gay rights, challenges to school prayer and to Christian displays in public, and the coarsening of American culture. But he rejected their solution because the groups, he wrote, saw no reason \u201cto engage the Christian message in conversation with public and universal discourse outside the circle of true believers.\u201d\u009d Neuhaus instead affirmed the core premise of Enlightenment political thought: the differentiation of public authority into separate, autonomous spheres that valued individual rights.<\/p>\n
He argued that the strongest support for these rights came from the Judeo-Christian tradition\u2019s foundational conviction: We are made in the image of God. Demanding absolute obedience to political dictates, whether in the name of God or something else, would undo centuries of political progress, and goes against God\u2019s own gift of free will to every human person.<\/p>\n
And so he rejected the Christian right\u2019s political project of establishing an explicitly Christian America. He further reasoned that if the right\u2019s only argument for how Christians could contribute to American public life was through exclusively religious dictates, then it made sense that secular elites were pushing back so strongly.<\/p>\n