First tale: A tenured sociologist at a prominent research university, with a couple of books under his belt on related subjects, publishes the first-ever research, using a nationally representative sample, on the young-adult outcomes for kids raised by people who have same-sex romantic relationships. The results show that these young adults have more difficult life experiences across a host of variables involving their employment, education, dependence on public assistance, mental health, relationship success and sexuality, trouble with the law, and experience of abuse.<\/p>\n
The study, which confirms that the \u201cgold standard\u201d\u009d for the rearing of children is the intact biological family, of married mom and dad staying together faithfully and raising their own offspring, naturally causes a furor. The peer-reviewed social science journal that published the study, along with commentary alongside it, commissions a member of its own editorial board (who has an openly hostile view of the study) to \u201caudit\u201d\u009d the peer-review process. He concludes that, as much as he dislikes the article, the journal did everything by the book in publishing it. The journal\u2019s editor, who is likewise friendly to the cause of same-sex marriage, stands by its publication, and in a subsequent issue publishes a follow-up article by its author, who cogently defends and restates his findings.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, at the sociologist\u2019s home institution, a \u201cscientific misconduct\u201d\u009d inquiry prompted by a hostile non-scholarly ideologue is undertaken, and the sociologist is cleared completely after a thorough review of his methods and even his correspondence. His double vindication, however\u201d\u201dby the journal that published his work and the university where he works\u201d\u201dmakes little headway against the howling media denunciation of his \u201cdebunked\u201d\u009d research. (This is a world where \u201cwe hate your results\u201d\u009d means the same thing as \u201cthey\u2019re invalid.\u201d\u009d)<\/p>\n