….one of the risks of the Assisted Dying debate is that it detracts from the debate about how to improve the experience of the living. Not everyone will think that being \u201d\u02dcan old lady hobbling up the road with a trolley\u2019 is an unbearable loss of dignity, as Pharaoh did.<\/p>\n
In his book, Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End, Atul Gawande argues that:<\/p>\n
\u201d\u02dcCertainly suffering at the end of life is sometimes unavoidable and unbearable, and helping people end their misery may be necessary. Given the opportunity, I would support laws to provide these kinds of prescriptions to people. About half don\u2019t even use their prescription. They are reassured just to know they have this control if they need it. But we damage entire societies if we let providing this capability divert us from improving the lives of the ill. Assisted living is far harder than assisted death, but its possibilities are far greater, as well.\u2019<\/p>\n
Campaigners against assisted dying may disagree with Gawande\u2019s support for prescriptions of medication that would allow a patient to end their lives if things become unbearable. What if life is physically bearable but painful as a result of an illness or disability, but emotionally overwhelming because someone fears being a burden on their family?<\/p>\n