\u201cLewis was committed to classical liberalism in the tradition of John Locke and John Stuart Mill,\u201d\u009d according to Professors Dyer and Watson, meaning he believed in the wisdom of limited government, equality under the law, and a robust private sphere. Lewis also presciently warned that Christians were tempted to abuse political power in ways that were bad for both Christianity and the state. He believed that theocracy was the worst form of government and detested the idea of a \u201cChristian party,\u201d\u009d which risked blaspheming the name of Christ.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe danger of mistaking our merely natural, though perhaps legitimate, enthusiasms for holy zeal, is always great,\u201d\u009d Lewis wrote. \u201cThe demon inherent in every party is at all times ready enough to disguise himself as the Holy Ghost; the formation of a Christian Party means handing over to him the most efficient makeup we can find.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
Lewis knew that a faith-informed conscience could advance justice and that Christianity played an enormous part in establishing the concept of natural rights and the dignity of the human person. But he also believed that legislation is not an exact science; that a Christian citizen does not, in the words of Professors Dyer and Watson, \u201chave the authority to represent his or her prudential judgment as required by Christianity\u201d\u009d; and that no political party can come close to approximating God\u2019s ideal. Christianity is about ends, not means, according to Lewis, and so he spent a good deal of his life articulating what he believed was the telos, the ultimate purpose, of human beings. Lewis was convinced that partisan political engagement often undermined that effort.<\/p>\n