Did Trump\u2019s zealous supporters \u201cembrace and act\u201d on this conviction in 2016? It\u2019s clear that Moore most certainly did. If the Baptists do fire Moore (or force his resignation), I hope they also have the integrity to revoke and rewrite their 1998 resolution. Insisting on \u201cconsistent honesty, moral purity, and the highest character\u201d will be left to the primaries, at best. After that, it\u2019s all partisanship, and the \u201clesser of two evils\u201d will be the only moral guide that matters. <\/p>\n
Baptists should consider carefully the consequences of their decisions. Some might say that it\u2019s \u201cjust about politics,\u201d and one shouldn\u2019t judge the nation\u2019s largest Protestant denomination on the basis of how it handles what some dismissively call its \u201clobbying arm.\u201d But for the church, every part of its operation is measured against the standard of Christ, not realpolitik or populism. <\/p>\n
Moore may have offended with his rhetoric (some of it was harsh, but some Christians are snowflakes). Was he wrong, though, to argue that the church fundamentally should have a more prophetic than partisan role in our culture? How much is God calling Christians to compromise other values for the sake of perceived progress on life and religious liberty? Should the church defend the liberties of others that it would like to exercise itself? Was Moore wrong to cling to the principles outlined in the church\u2019s own resolutions<\/p>\n
These are the questions at issue not just for Southern Baptists but for all Christians. Moore\u2019s fate matters because these questions matter. The church is not a partisan interest group. Moore understands this reality. Do his critics?<\/p>\n