Another petition supporting the rehearing filed Sept. 25 by various churches and the Diocese, includes these arguments:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe sole basis on which Appellants have argued, and the Court has so held, that St. Philips (as an example) should be divested of its property is that St. Philips Church, in 1987, acknowledged the purpose of the parish corporation as being \u2018in accord with the Articles of Religion\u2019 of the national church (or more precisely the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, according to the Articles of Restatement filed with the SC Secretary of State by St. Philips in 1987.)<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Articles of Religion of the national church were established in 1801, one hundred and seventy-eight years prior to the Dennis Canon. The articles of Religion, similar to those for other Protestant Churches, contain nothing more than a summary of the religious doctrine, theology and beliefs of the national church and St. Philips Church. The Articles of Religion do not mention the constitution or any of the canons of the national church, let alone the Dennis Canon adopted 178 years after the establishment of the Articles of Religion.\u201d<\/p>\n
Interestingly, The Episcopal Church has never required subscription to the Articles, which now appear in a section called \u201cHistorical Documents\u201d in the back of the Book of Common Prayer.<\/p>\n
All this, along with the controversy surrounding Justice Hearn\u2019s participation in the initial ruling due to her family involvement in a church with ties to the national church, makes for interesting consideration as the mediation for and possible rehearing of the Diocese\u2019s case approaches.<\/p>\n