America has struggled with university censorship before. Litigators have battled campus speech codes for a full generation. Intolerance in the name of tolerance has been a fact of campus life for a long time. But there\u2019s something different about intersectionality. The virus has jumped from patient zero and is spreading like wildfire in blue culture. And it\u2019s spreading in part because it is filling that religion-shaped hole in the human heart.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m hardly the first person to make this argument. Andrew Sullivan has\u00a0noted intersectionality\u2019s religious elements<\/a>, and John Sexton\u00a0has been on this beat<\/a>\u00a0for a year. Smart people know religious zeal when they see it.<\/p>\n While there\u2019s not yet an Apostle\u2019s Creed of intersectionality, it can roughly be defined as the belief that oppression operates in complicated, \u201cinterlocking\u201d ways. So the experience of, say, a white trans woman is different in important ways from the experience of a black lesbian. A white trans woman will experience the privilege of her skin but also oppression due to her gender identity. A black lesbian may experience the privilege of \u201ccis\u201d gender identity but also oppression due to race and sexuality. It\u2019s identity politics on steroids, where virtually every issue in American life can and must be filtered through the prisms of race, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity.<\/p>\n Intersectionality privileges experiential authority, with each distinct identity group able to speak conclusively and decisively only about their own experience. So when an issue impacts trans rights, the trans community takes the lead. The responsibility of the rest of the community is to act, then, as their \u201callies.\u201d If a racial issue comes to the fore \u2014 for example, in the context of protests over police shootings \u2014 then African Americans take the lead, and LGBT or women\u2019s groups come alongside in support.<\/p>\n