Google exists to answer our small questions. But how will we answer larger questions about Google itself? Is it a monopoly? Does it exert too much power over our lives? Should the government regulate it as a public utility \u2014 or even break it up?<\/p>\n
In recent months, public concerns about Google have become more pronounced. This February, the New York Times Magazine published \u201cThe Case Against Google,\u201d a blistering account of how \u201cthe search giant is squelching competition before it begins.\u201d The Wall Street Journal published a similar article in January on the \u201cantitrust case\u201d against Google, along with Facebook and Amazon, whose market shares it compared to Standard Oil and AT&T at their peaks. Here and elsewhere, a wide array of reporters and commentators have reflected on Google\u2019s immense power \u2014 not only over its competitors, but over each of us and the information we access \u2014 and suggested that the traditional antitrust remedies of regulation or breakup may be necessary to rein Google in.<\/p>\n
Dreams of war between Google and government, however, obscure a much different relationship that may emerge between them \u2014 particularly between Google and progressive government. For eight years, Google and the Obama administration forged a uniquely close relationship. Their special bond is best ascribed not to the revolving door, although hundreds of meetings were held between the two; nor to crony capitalism, although hundreds of people have switched jobs from Google to the Obama administration or vice versa; nor to lobbying prowess, although Google is one of the top corporate lobbyists.<\/p>\n
Rather, the ultimate source of the special bond between Google and the Obama White House \u2014 and modern progressive government more broadly \u2014 has been their common ethos. Both view society\u2019s challenges today as social-engineering problems, whose resolutions depend mainly on facts and objective reasoning. Both view information as being at once ruthlessly value-free and yet, when properly grasped, a powerful force for ideological and social reform. And so both aspire to reshape Americans\u2019 informational context, ensuring that we make choices based only upon what they consider the right kinds of facts \u2014 while denying that there would be any values or politics embedded in the effort<\/strong>.<\/p>\n