Note: this is a little dated, but contains important information not found elsewhere. Because of the structure of this Lambeth, a lot of what happened will only dribble out in the days and weeks ahead and it will be a while before a coherent and clear picture emerges I think–KSH<\/i>.<\/p>\n
by Andrew Carey<\/p>\n
Anglicans need to speak \u201d\u02dclife\u2019 to each other, rather than \u201d\u02dcthreatening death\u2019 declared the Archbishop of Canterbury in his most significant plea yet to the Lambeth Conference to back his plans for both \u201d\u02dccovenant\u2019 and \u201d\u02dccouncil\u2019 to bring coherence and order to the Anglican Communion.<\/p>\n
In a late scheduled Presidential address as the Conference entered its most controversial moments with the final days devoted to Bible, homosexuality and the covenant, Archbishop Williams, made what he described as a \u201d\u02dcrisky\u2019 attempt to interpret both sides of the debate to each other. He also called upon them to \u201d\u02dcspeak from the centre\u2019 in a spirit of generosity.<\/p>\n
\u201cAt the moment we seem often to be threatening death to each other, not offering life.<\/p>\n
What some see as confused or reckless innovation in some provinces is felt as a body-blow to the integrity of mission and a matter of literal physical risk to Christians,\u201d\u009d he declared.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe reaction to this is in turn felt as an annihilating judgement on a whole local church, undermining its legitimacy and pouring scorn on its witness.\u201d\u009d
\n
He called on the bishops to speak life to each other on the basis of backing change to the communion in the form of a covenant, \u201cthat recognizes the need to grow towards each other (and also recognizes that not all may choose that way).\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
Only such a covenant, he said, could avoid further disintegration. His acknowledgement that not all may choose to follow the covenant, was left hanging in the air, with no clear direction as to what that would mean for the nonparticipating churches. His address was greeted with no applause, but with \u201d\u02dcsobriety\u2019 and muted conversation.<\/p>\n
The Bishop of Exeter, Michael Langrish, later revealed that an \u201cinexorable logic\u201d\u009d was emerging. He said this was of a \u201ccore communion with strengthened structures and some who will not accept that.<\/p>\n
There will be continuing fellowship with those churches.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
He likened the relationship to that of the Anglicans and Methodists who are exploring a covenant with each other.<\/p>\n
\u201cA major question,\u201d\u009d said Bishop Langrish, \u201cis how we move towards that point. The highest degree of fellowship whilst allowing for an orderly separation.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
He said it would continue to be messy and difficult, especially in parts of North America.<\/p>\n
Dr William\u2019s plea for a covenant is accepted by the vast majority of Bishops at the Lambeth Conference, but among American bishops it is not seen as a foregone conclusion. Bishop Jon Bruno of Los Angeles, said afterwards, that it would take time to absorb what the Archbishop was saying. \u201cI don\u2019t know whether there\u2019s going to be a covenant,\u201d\u009d he said.<\/p>\n
The Archbishop argued that in urging the bishops to speak from the centre, this was not a middle-point between two extremes, \u201cthat just creates another sort of political alignment.<\/p>\n
I mean that we should try to speak from the heart of our identity as Anglicans; and ultimately from that deepest centre which is our awareness of living in and as the Body of Christ.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
He said that his plans for \u201d\u02dccovenant\u2019 and \u201d\u02dccouncil\u2019 was his vision for the way forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cBy this I meant that we needed a bit more of a structure in our international affairs to be able to give clear guidance on what would and would not be a grave and lasting divisive course of action by a local church.<\/p>\n
He warned that future divisions could be about changes on baptism, or the abandonment of the Nicene creed. Referring to proposals from the Windsor Continuation Group for a faith and order commission, and a Pastoral Forum, he said that such bodies should carry confidence and authority.<\/p>\n
Two groups talking past each other. The vast majority have a genuine desire to stay together for for a small minority there are two different versions of what belonging together means. Two understandings of this thing we call Anglicanism. The vast majority want to take steps towards restoring Communion.<\/p>\n
A smaller group – whose language of communion is based on feelings – what it means to me, what I can get from it. A transactional view of communion which is much more suited to a federation or fellowship of churches. The inexorable logic which is emerging out of this conference and which what Rowan appeared to be stressing this evening is of a core communion with strengthened structures and some who will not accept that. There will be continuing fellowship with those churches.<\/p>\n
Rowan seemed to end up in that point. A major question is how we move towards that point – the highest degree of fellowship whilst allowing for an orderly separation. A challenge to all of us. -It\u2019s clearly going to be difficult and messy in parts of North America especially the US. Canada I\u2019ve found in the last 10 days is in a different place from the US. Vast majority of Canadian bishops have a real sense of communion<\/p>\n
The implication of a covenant is that you have to have procedures for holding those who are separated and damaged. Equally if we are to end up with enriched relationships – some not fully accept – pastoral Forum to enable us to get there.<\/p>\n
Carey\/Hume procedures which enabled the problems that arose from the ordination of women to be eased – something like that but I don\u2019t want to draw too close a parallel. We\u2019re still on Tuesday – the Archbishops speech was received with sobriety, quiet muted conversation.<\/p>\n
–This article appeared on page 1 of the Church of England Newspaper of August 1, 2008<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Note: this is a little dated, but contains important information not found elsewhere. Because of the structure of this Lambeth, a lot of what happened will only dribble out in the days and weeks ahead and it will be a…<\/span><\/p>\n