People used to accept that much of life was boring. Memoirs of pre-21st-century life are rife with tedium. When not idling in drawing rooms, members of the leisured class took long walks and stared at trees. They went motoring and stared at more trees. Those who had to work had it a lot harder. Agricultural and industrial jobs were often mind-numbing; few people were looking to be fulfilled by paid labor. Children could expect those kinds of futures and they got used to the idea from an early age, left unattended with nothing but bookshelves and tree branches, and later, bad afternoon television.<\/p>\n
Only a few short decades ago, during the lost age of underparenting, grown-ups thought a certain amount of boredom was appropriate. And children came to appreciate their empty agendas. In an interview with GQ magazine<\/a>, Lin-Manuel Miranda credited his unattended afternoons with fostering inspiration. \u201cBecause there is nothing better to spur creativity than a blank page or an empty bedroom,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Nowadays, subjecting a child to such inactivity is viewed as a dereliction of parental duty. In a much-read story in The Times, \u201cThe Relentlessness of Modern Parenting<\/a>,\u201d Claire Cain Miller cited a recent study<\/a> that found that regardless of class, income or race, parents believed that \u201cchildren who were bored after school should be enrolled in extracurricular activities, and that parents who were busy should stop their task and draw with their children if asked.\u201d<\/p>\n Every spare moment is to be optimized, maximized, driven toward a goal.<\/p>\n When not being uberparented, kids today are left to their own devices \u2014 their own digital devices, that is….<\/p>\n Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n In Opinion<\/p>\n Pamela Paul writes, “When you reach your breaking point, boredom teaches you to respond constructively, to make something happen for yourself. But unless we are faced with a steady diet of stultifying boredom, we never learn how.” https:\/\/t.co\/7T57d8jJUy<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 The New York Times (@nytimes) February 3, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n