It\u2019s worth noting that [Anthea] Butler, in that same speech, went on to decry evangelicalism\u2019s \u201cproblem of whiteness.\u201d She called out white evangelical scholars\u2019 inability or unwillingness to confront that problem. [David] Bebbington\u2019s four points, Butler asserted, are in fact culturally and racially specific.<\/p>\n
Moreover, a recent LifeWay survey found that fewer than half of those who self-identify as evangelicals \u201cstrongly agree\u201d with core evangelical beliefs. Many \u201cevangelicals,\u201d according to another LifeWay Research survey, in fact hold heretical beliefs.<\/p>\n
When a large number of people who self-identify as evangelicals fail to ascribe to what some scholars have dictated to be the essential tenets of evangelicalism, does that mean that they are not actually evangelicals? Or does it suggest that something else has come to define evangelicalism?<\/p>\n
Some evangelicals might see this erosion of theology and the politicization of evangelicalism as an abandonment of an illustrious heritage, but one cannot wish away the movement that evangelicalism has become.<\/p>\n
If theology no longer defines evangelicalism, how should we conceptualize the movement?<\/p>\n