Here is what WAS passed in the Traditional Plan that the Judicial Council has already upheld as constitutional, and so which will be our new church law before too long:<\/p>\n
First, we enacted a Traditional Plan petition (#90032<\/a>) that clarifies the definition of what we mean when we say we forbid \u201cself-avowed practicing homosexuals\u201d to be ministers, candidates, or appointed pastors in our denomination. It was widely understood what the church meant by this. However, for many years, liberal bishops and others had treated this as a loophole, and claimed that unless even openly partnered gay ministers said the precise words \u201cI am a practicing homosexual\u201d or answered uncomfortable direct questions about their regular \u201cgenital contact\u201d with someone of the same sex, then there was \u201cno evidence\u201d that they had actually violated our moral standards. Through such word games, some clergy in some liberal areas have been allowed to remain in good standing while knowingly violating our moral standards. This petition closes this loophole, by saying that from now on, anyone who \u201cis living in a same-sex marriage, domestic partnership or civil union,\u201d or \u201cwho publicly states that she or he is a practicing homosexual\u201d automatically meets the definition of who is in violation of our ministry standards, with no required further questions about \u201cgenital contact\u201d or awkward reliance on whether or not someone says the magic words. This will make enforcement of this longtime standard much simpler and easier to prove than it has ever been.<\/p>\n Secondly, we enacted another Traditional Plan petition (#90044<\/a>) that limits the ability of bishops to dismiss complaints against clergy accused of wrongdoing. Our process for disciplining wayward clergy begins when someone files a complaint with his or her bishop. However, in recent years, we have seen liberal bishops simply dismiss complaints against clergy who violated sexual-morality standards with which the bishop did not agree. Such abuses of their ability to dismiss complaints had the potential to let each bishop unilaterally both nullify any part of our standards for clergy with which they disagree and also perhaps protect personal friends from facing accountability. But now this petition forbids bishops from dismissing complaints unless the complaints have \u201cno basis in law or fact.\u201d This petition also requires that any time bishops dismiss a complaint, they must share a written explanation with the person who filed the complaint, something which bishops had not always readily done. And all of this also applies to complaints against bishops.<\/p>\n Thirdly, we enacted another Traditional Plan petition (#90046<\/a>) that reforms the \u201cjust resolution\u201d process (the UMC equivalent of out-of-court settlements) that had been subject to such abuse by liberal bishops in recent years. This petition prevents how some liberal bishops had arranged \u201cjust resolutions\u201d for violations of our sexuality standards that completely cut out the person who filed the complaint (the complainant) from the process. This new church law makes the complaint filer a party to the process, and requires that \u201cevery effort shall be made to have the complainant(s) agree to the resolution before it may take effect.\u201d<\/p>\n Fourthly, we enacted half of another Traditional Plan petition (#90045<\/a>) on \u201cjust resolutions.\u201d This one requires that all just resolutions must \u201cstate all identified harms and how they shall be addressed.\u201d This is an improvement over how previous \u201cjust resolutions\u201d with clergy who violated our sexuality standards have avoided any pretense of addressing the concerns of the complainants.<\/p>\n Fifthly, we finally adopted another, particularly significant Traditional Plan petition (#90042<\/a>), that has been filibustered for seven years since the 2012 General Conference, which requires mandatory penalties for clergy found in a church trial to have violated our covenant against performing pastorally harmful same-sex union ceremonies.<\/p>\n