The distraction of our information age fails at character formation. What\u2019s in cyberspace cannot shape our characters, only what is in the mind. (To be sure, data and images often move from cyberspace to our mind, at which point they do shape our character for good or ill.) Having information at our fingertips is not the same as having stored it in our mind. This is why both classical and medieval authors were deeply concerned with memorization. Traditional practices such as lectio divina are grounded in the recognition that distraction must be countered by memorization and meditation. (The two were virtually synonymous in the Middle Ages.) Medieval monks devised all sorts of ways to facilitate Scripture memorization because they recognized that it offers the boundaries and confines within which the moral life can flourish.<\/p>\n
Memorization is a Lenten practice, reshaping our memories to be like God\u2019s. When our memories are reshaped and reordered according to the immutable faithfulness of God in Christ, we re-appropriate God\u2019s character\u2014his steadfast love, his mercy, his compassion. Repentance, therefore, is a turning back to the virtues of God as we see them in Christ. Being united to him, we are united to the very character of God, for it is in the God-man that God\u2019s virtue and human virtue meet. The hypostatic union is the locus of our repentance: In Christ human memory is re-figured to the memory of God.<\/p>\n
Memorization may be a largely abandoned practice. But is by memorizing that we turn away from sinful distraction and share in God\u2019s own, ever-reliable memory in Christ.<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n Memorization is a Lenten practice, a repentant turning back to the memory of God.https:\/\/t.co\/nZxI66IEPm<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 First Things (@firstthingsmag) March 16, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n