{"id":83710,"date":"2019-07-13T17:00:21","date_gmt":"2019-07-13T21:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=83710"},"modified":"2019-07-13T16:42:27","modified_gmt":"2019-07-13T20:42:27","slug":"the-week-liberals-astonishingly-radical-shift-on-gender","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=83710","title":{"rendered":"(The Week) Damon Linker–Liberals’ astonishingly radical shift on gender"},"content":{"rendered":"

As Andrew Sullivan has powerfully argued, the two positions are fundamentally incompatible<\/a>. The first, which morally justifies same-sex marriage, presumes that biological sex and binary gender differences are real, that they matter, and that they can’t just be erased at will. The second, which Manjoo and many transgender activists embrace and espouse, presumes the opposite \u2014 that those differences can and should be immediately dissolved. To affirm the truth of both positions is to embrace incoherence.<\/p>\n

But that assumes that we’re treating them as arguments. If, instead, we view them as expressions of what it can feel <\/em>like <\/em>at two different moments in a society devoted to the principle of individualism, they can be brought into a kind of alignment. Each is simply an expression of rebellion against a different but equally intolerable constraint on the individual. All that’s changed is the object of rebellion.<\/p>\n

Will Manjoo’s call for liberation from the tyranny of the gender binary catch on in the way that the push for same-sex marriage did before it? I have no idea. What I do know is that, whatever happens, it’s likely to be followed by another undoubtedly very different crusade in the name of individual freedom, and then another, and another, as our society (and others like it) continues to work through the logic of its devotion to the principle of individualism.<\/p>\n

The only thing that could halt the process is the rejection of that principle altogether.<\/p>\n

Read it all<\/a> and make sure to follow all the links.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cFor perhaps the first time in American history, it is a nominally secular, progressive elite that finds itself swept up into a moral fervor and eager to overturn (linguistic and other) conventions in a surge of self-certainty and self-righteousness.\u201d https:\/\/t.co\/t3DIFGU6J1<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Josh Kraushaar (@HotlineJosh) July 13, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n