A lawsuit over a faulty background check that allowed a South Carolina man to buy the gun he used to kill nine people in a racist attack at a Charleston church was reinstated Friday by a federal appeals court.<\/p>\n
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a ruling from a lower court judge who threw out the claims brought by relatives of people killed by Dylann Roof in the 2015 massacre, and by survivors.<\/p>\n
The lower court judge found the government immune from liability. The judge said the families\u2019 claims did not fit into narrow exceptions to laws that shield government employees from liability while carrying out their official duties. But the appeals court panel disagreed.<\/p>\n
The FBI has acknowledged that Roof\u2019s drug possession arrest in Columbia, South Carolina, weeks before the shooting at AME Emanuel Church should have prevented him from buying a gun. Roof has been sentenced to death for the slayings.<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n A lawsuit over a faulty background check that allowed Dylann Roof to buy the gun he used to kill nine people in a racist attack at a South Carolina church was reinstated by a federal appeals court. https:\/\/t.co\/giillkMXzP<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 PBS NewsHour (@NewsHour) August 30, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n