Inspired in part by Paul Volcker, Nicholas Brady and Eugene Ludwig, and announced last week, the Paulson plan is a pure establishment play. It would assign nearly unlimited authority to a small coterie of policy makers. It does not rely on any system of checks and balances, but on the wisdom and public spiritedness of those in charge. It offers succor to the investment banks that contributed to this mess and will burn through large piles of taxpayer money. But in exchange, it promises to restore confidence. Somebody, amid all the turmoil, will occupy the commanding heights. Somebody will have the power to absorb debt and establish stability.<\/p>\n
Liberals and conservatives generally dislike the plan. William Greider of The Nation writes: \u201cIf Wall Street gets away with this, it will represent an historic swindle of the American public \u201d\u201d all sugar for the villains, lasting pain and damage for the victims.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
He approvingly quotes the conservative economist Christopher Whalen of Institutional Risk Analytics: \u201cThe joyous reception from Congressional Democrats to Paulson\u2019s latest massive bailout proposal smells an awful lot like yet another corporatist love fest between Washington\u2019s one-party government and the Sell Side investment banks.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n
Thanks to their criticism, the plan will be pinned back. Oversight will be put in place. But the plan will probably not be stopped. The markets would tank. There is a hunger for stability, which only the Treasury and the Fed can provide.<\/p>\n
So we have arrived at one of those moments. The global financial turmoil has pulled nearly everybody out of their normal ideological categories. The pressure of reality has compelled new thinking about the relationship between government and the economy. And lo and behold, a new center and a new establishment is emerging.<\/p>\n