{"id":90175,"date":"2020-03-03T09:00:58","date_gmt":"2020-03-03T14:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=90175"},"modified":"2020-03-02T18:53:27","modified_gmt":"2020-03-02T23:53:27","slug":"fb-charles-fain-lehman-reviews-ross-douthats-the-decadent-society","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=90175","title":{"rendered":"(FB) Charles Fain Lehman Reviews Ross Douthat\u2019s \u2018The Decadent Society\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

Each of Douthat’s “four horsemen of decadence”\u2014economic stagnation, collective infertility, political sclerosis, and cultural repetition\u2014represents structural choices to sacrifice the future for the present. Weak innovation is driven by selecting short-term returns over investment<\/a>, and by a publish-or-perish paradigm<\/a> that makes careers but not discoveries. Collapsing fertility rates reflect deferred childbearing<\/a>, spending the future social and personal benefits of children to ensure individuals’ present stability. Sclerosis is produced by a political class that clings to<\/a> its own power, at the cost of training a future elite. And cultural repetition is in large part a product of Hollywood playing it safe, churning out blockbuster pablum instead of investing in something that might fail.<\/p>\n

In other words, what is meant by “decadence” is in part “risk-averseness.” Where once we dared to do impossible things in the hope of a better tomorrow, now we pour everything possible into simply preserving the status quo.<\/p>\n

The book’s last section sees Douthat imagining ways we could break out of this feedback loop. Through three chapters, he considers a societal collapse driven by mass strife over immigration, a la <\/em>Michel Houllebecq; a rising Africa driving “renaissance,” and a return either to the will to power through renewed space exploration, or the will to meaning through a religious revival.<\/p>\n

Even in the case of catastrophe, Douthat seems to see such regime-shattering possibilities as fundamentally positive. The return of history, even in its worst forms, might be better than the eternal now. As writer Tara Isabella Burton put it in her own review<\/a>, “What we need, Douthat implies, is a renewed eschatological vision of what history, and what we, are for<\/em> [emphasis in original].” It is little surprise that among Douthat’s many positive reviewers is arch-techno-optimist Peter Thiel, who writes<\/a> that, “If there is a problem with the book, it is that Douthat does not press his own theme [of returning to the future] urgently enough.”<\/p>\n

For all the book’s many strengths, there is one question to which Douthat gives perhaps inadequate treatment: Why has decadence happened?<\/p>\n

Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n

Review: Ross Douthat\u2019s \u2018The Decadent Society\u2019 https:\/\/t.co\/R9HGVGyLNf<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/YPOrVqu5fW<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Scott White (@sdwhite) March 1, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n