{"id":91219,"date":"2020-04-01T18:43:11","date_gmt":"2020-04-01T22:43:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=91219"},"modified":"2020-04-03T06:49:54","modified_gmt":"2020-04-03T10:49:54","slug":"anglican-diocese-of-sc-south-carolina-supreme-court-denies-petition-for-writ-of-prohibition-by-the-episcopal-church","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kendallharmon.net\/?p=91219","title":{"rendered":"(Anglican Diocese of SC) South Carolina Supreme Court denies Petition for Writ of Prohibition by The Episcopal Church"},"content":{"rendered":"

The South Carolina Supreme Court announced yesterday<\/a> that it has denied the Petition for a Writ of Prohibition<\/a> submitted on February 21st by The Episcopal Church (TEC) and The Episcopal Church in South Carolina (TECSC), which sought to prevent Judge Edgar W. Dickson from ruling on the Diocese\u2019s and parishes motion to clarify the Supreme Court\u2019s earlier ruling. If granted, the petition would have prevented Judge Dickson from ruling on the case as he has indicated he was about to do. The Supreme Court\u2019s order succinctly states: “Petitioners seek a Writ of Prohibition to prevent the circuit court from clarifying this Court\u2019s decision in Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. Episcopal Church<\/em>, 412 S.C. 211, 806 S.E. 2d 82 (2017). The petition is denied.\u201d<\/p>\n

This ruling by the Supreme Court allows Judge Dickson to proceed with clarifying the Court\u2019s earlier August 2017 ruling, which was comprised of five separate opinions. That situation is unprecedented in the history of the court. This open-ended denial of the petition by the Supreme Court places no restrictions upon the appropriateness of Judge Dickson\u2019s work in interpreting the meaning of the original ruling.<\/p>\n

Ironically, this ruling comes almost exactly a year after TEC and TECSC filed a similar Petition with the high court for a Writ of Mandamus meant to force Judge Dickson to rule in the case. The Mandamus Petition asked the Supreme Court to require the Circuit Court to interpret the Supreme Court\u2019s August 2, 2017 ruling favorably for TEC and TECSC. That petition was also denied by the Supreme Court in July of last year.<\/p>\n

As before, the Prohibition Petition was an attempt to end run Judge Dickson\u2019s exercise of his discretion in interpreting the August 2, 2017 decision in a manner that may differ from TEC and TECSC\u2019s interpretation.<\/p>\n

The Anglican Diocese of South Carolina welcomes this decision by the South Carolina Supreme Court affirming that the Circuit Court is the proper venue to resolve the many uncertain issues arising from the August 2, 2017 decision.<\/p>\n

The Rev. Marcus Kaiser, President of the diocesan Standing Committee observed, \u201cIn this time, our focus is on caring for our people and praying for a world deeply rocked by the COVID-19 pandemic. Still, we are profoundly grateful that the Supreme Court has denied the request for a Writ of Prohibition, and hope this ruling helps move things along. We pray for Judge Dickson and the complex issues he has to deal with, even as we continue to focus on concerns far more pressing to most people.\u201d<\/p>\n

The brief in support of the motion by the Diocese to dismiss this Petition can be found on the Diocesan website<\/a>, along with further background on the earlier Petition for Mandamus<\/a>. The August 2, 2017, ruling by the Supreme Court may also be found here.<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

(#Anglican<\/a> Diocese of SC) #SouthCarolina<\/a> Supreme Court denies Petition for Writ of Prohibition by The Episcopal Church https:\/\/t.co\/PZYCugWZhQ<\/a> #law<\/a> #religion<\/a> #parishministry<\/a> #history<\/a> #lowcountrylife<\/a> #stewardship<\/a> #ethics<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/v5BuyYENTM<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Kendall Harmon (@KendallHarmon6) April 1, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n