In his ruling, Judge Dickson made several important conclusions of law. Chief among them was his ruling on the central issue of interpreting the Collective Opinions. As he noted in quoting former Chief Justice Toal, \u201cThe Court\u2019s collective opinions in this matter give rise to great uncertainty, so that we have given little to no collective guidance in this case or in church property disputes like this going forward.\u201d He concluded that, \u201cThis court must distill the five separate opinions, identify the court\u2019s intent and produce a logical directive.\u201d With respect to parish property, the law of this case follows the precedent of All Saints Parish, Waccamaw (2009). In his deciding opinion, Chief Justice Beatty, \u201cfound that the Dennis Canon, standing alone, does not unequivocally convey an intention to transfer ownership of property to the national church\u2026\u201d In accordance with established South Carolina law, establishment of a trust interest must meet the standard of being \u201clegally cognizable\u201d. The Diocese has argued that there is no such evidence of accession to the Dennis Canon that meets this standard and Judge Dickson concluded, \u201cThis court finds that no parish expressly acceded to the Dennis Canon\u201d and \u201cdefendants failed to prove creation of a trust.\u201d He further concluded, \u201cTEC\u2019s argument that their unilaterally drafted Dennis Canon created a trust under South Carolina law is rejected.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the case of the Trustees and St. Christopher Camp and Conference Center, Judge Dickson affirmed that under the All Saints ruling that a non-profit corporation which follows the correct steps to sever its association with another entity does so with all its property interests intact. The Collective Opinions found that the Diocese and Parishes properly disassociated. As Judge Dickson explains, \u201cApplying neutral principles of law, this court finds the Diocese and Parishes properly disassociated and control their real and personal property with any improvements thereon. Following the narrowest grounds of the majority in the Collective opinions, this Court finds that Camp St. Christopher should remain as titled in the Trustees of the Protestant Episcopal Church in South Carolina as stated in the 1951 deed.\u201d<\/p>\n
On the final matter of registered trademarks, Judge Dickson said \u201cThis court finds that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over matters related to trademarks, intellectual property and service marks,\u201d Those matters are currently on appeal before the Federal Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond.<\/p>\n
Speaking on behalf of the Diocese, the Rev. Canon Jim Lewis observed, \u201cThe Diocese welcomes the clarity of Judge Dickson\u2019s interpretation of the Supreme Court\u2019s Collective Opinion. By twice denying petitions by TEC and TECSC to prevent Judge Dickson from completing this task, the Supreme Court has clearly signaled its desire to resolve these issues. We remain confident that our ability to disassociate from TEC, with all our legal rights intact, will continue to be affirmed.\u201d<\/p>\n
Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n ‘The Anglican Diocese of #SouthCarolina<\/a> anticipates that Judge Dickson\u2019s ruling will be appealed and is hopeful that if the State Supreme Court agrees to hear our case again, they will uphold the clarity brought by today\u2019s decisions’ https:\/\/t.co\/UChGLw2F1U<\/a> #parishministry<\/a> #law<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/L8oDVQd0Xk<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Kendall Harmon (@KendallHarmon6) June 19, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n