The pressure on time as a result of the extended debate on Living in Love and Faith provisions was never going to allow this group of sessions to complete the scheduled debate on simplifying the governance of the national church institutions (NCIs). An interim report presented to the General Synod for debate contained 22 recommendations in relation to creating a single governance body: Church of England National Services (CENS).
Prudence Dailey (Oxford) tried to intervene at the outset to adjourn the debate, but procedure meant that the motion — to welcome the report and encourage the National Church Governance Project Board (NCGPB) to continue developing a legislative framework — had first to be moved by the Bishop of Guildford, the Rt Revd Andrew Watson.
He was keen to do this, he said, given how many staff had been working on it. Many people would be affected by the changes, he said, referring to a “them-and-us” trust deficit in the Church at many levels, compounded by a national governance structure that meant that people were unclear how decisions were made. The “convoluted structures” were liable to be bypassed to get something done, he suggested.
The positive aim of CENS was clarity, Bishop Watson said. There would be a full overview at the July sessions.
Miss Dailey tried again for adjournment on a “matter of exceptional significance and importance” that, through no one’s fault, had been “shoved in at the tag end of Synod”. It needed proper scrutiny, she said.
Bishop Watson urged members to resist adjournment at this stage, which they did.
General Synod digest: Governance plan sidelined by same-sex debate https://t.co/JCK55RGOci
— Church Times (@ChurchTimes) February 17, 2023