Gloating about being orthodox as opposed to revisionist might seem like a winning ticket.
After all, the Anglican Church in North America was born from the Episcopal Church’s embrace of pansexuality, and it has watched as that revisionist denomination has paid a steep price in lost membership, declining attendance, and an aging Boomer generation slowly disappearing from the pews.
It was ACNA’s moment. Or it should have been. But it has not worked out as seamlessly as hoped.
Across 17 years, the headline number is around 130,000 members with just under 100,000 in weekly attendance. Even its apparent “growth” in recent years partly reflects better data collection rather than actual new members. The denomination has seen multiple bishops depart under a cloud — several forced out over sexual misconduct. The current Archbishop Steve Wood was compelled to step aside and now faces an ecclesiastical trial on allegations of sexual misbehavior, bullying, and plagiarism. No ACNA archbishop in the denomination’s short history has faced such a constellation of charges.
Yet hope springs eternal. Mark Eldridge of the American Anglican Council, fresh from the Provincial Council meeting in Tulsa, Oklahoma, declared that reports of ACNA’s death have been grossly exaggerated by social media bloggers. While lauding the camaraderie of assembled delegates, he soberly noted that half of the 1,005 churches comprising the ACNA average fewer than 50 in Sunday attendance, and nearly 75% average fewer than 100. The data confirms what many have long suspected — and what this writer knows firsthand: my own parish in Germantown, Philadelphia was forced to close for lack of growth, interest, and inadequate leadership.
That reality has prompted Anglican Revitalization Ministries to launch three programs — Revive, Renew, and Reframe — with church planting described as “desperately needed in a growing province.” But a closer look at the methodology raises serious questions about whether ACNA is on the right track.
The old “come and hear” model has not worked in decades. The imperative is “go and tell” — but that begs the question of how. Trained missiologists and frontline church planters who have succeeded on the global stage believe ACNA has it backwards. If “church” means a building with professional paid clergy, the growth strategy is dead before it starts.
— David Virtue (@david_virt8366) June 24, 2026
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.