“Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside.”
Too bad the Germans didn’t include Heisenberg on their team. He could have argued that the mere act of viewing the ball changes whether a goal is or is not made.
Of course, by questioning Confucius’s determination of a goal, Heisenberg could have been yellow-carded.
“Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside.”
Ha ha ha ha…..
Too bad the Germans didn’t include Heisenberg on their team. He could have argued that the mere act of viewing the ball changes whether a goal is or is not made.
Of course, by questioning Confucius’s determination of a goal, Heisenberg could have been yellow-carded.
Wittgenstein off? Must have been a category mistake.
Some regard Wittgenstein’s turn as a red card offence.
I have had a bad day at works. Thanks, Kendall for closing it out with a laugh!