Religion and Ethics Weekly: Pope Benedict's Foreign Policy

LAWTON: Some analysts believe that academic impulse has created a foreign relations challenge.

Rev. REESE: Benedict has had some problems on the world stage, because I think sometimes he thinks he’s still in a classroom where he can use words that have technical meanings that he has defined and that students are supposed to understand and know. But when he says them on the world stage, people take them at their street level meaning, and as a result there’s misunderstanding.

LAWTON: The most obvious example was his 2006 speech at the University of Regensburg in Germany, where he quoted a 14th-century emperor who criticized the Prophet Muhammad and accused Muslims of spreading their faith by the sword.

Rev. REESE: He spoke about Islam as being irrational. Well, what he meant was that it’s a religion based on faith, where faith is much more important than reason, you know. He wasn’t saying that Muslims are irrational, you know, but that’s the way it was heard.

LAWTON: The speech set off violent protests in several Muslim nations, a vivid demonstration of the impact a pope’s words can have. The Vatican issued a clarification, and during a visit to Turkey Benedict made a high profile visit to a mosque.

Prof. PHAM: On one hand, a great deal of setback in dialogue certainly occurred. On the other hand, after the initial setback a number of moderate Muslim scholars actually wrote to the pope, 138 of them, and said, “Well, we have some differences clearly, but now that they’re highlighted maybe we should engage in a dialogue,” and so a process of dialogue has begun.

Read it all.

print
Posted in * Religion News & Commentary, Other Churches, Pope Benedict XVI, Roman Catholic

2 comments on “Religion and Ethics Weekly: Pope Benedict's Foreign Policy

  1. Irenaeus says:

    Well, finally a church leader who’s actually entitled to have a “foreign policy.”

  2. Words Matter says:

    A good discussion, especially given that Fr. Reese has an axe to grind, but doesn’t. Regensburg was handled a bit simplistically, but maybe that it usually is.

    An important point:

    (Vatican diplomats are at their posts) … as religious representatives of the pope and therefore have close contacts with the local church, and the local church is often, in many countries, the closest to the people, and so their sources of information are often much better than that of, say, an embassy of a large Western country where for security reasons most of the diplomats are essentially living in a fortress.

    Apparently, there are two academic Peter Phams. The other one, a priest, teaches at Georgetown and is currently in dutch with the Church over questionable doctrine.