Once diversity is received as a positive fact, it is necessary to make persons accept not only the existence of the other’s culture, but also the desire to be enriched with it. Addressing Catholics, my predecessor, the Servant of God Paul VI, enunciated his profound conviction in these terms: “The Church must enter into dialogue with the world in which she lives. The Church becomes word, the Church becomes message, the Church becomes conversation” (“Ecclesiam Suam,” No. 67). We live in what is usually called a “plural world,” characterized by the speed of communications, the mobility of peoples and their economic, political and cultural interdependence. Precisely in this, perhaps dramatic hour, though unfortunately many Europeans seem to forget Europe’s Christian roots, the latter are alive and should trace the path and nourish the hope of millions of citizens who share the same values.
Believers should always be willing to promote initiatives of intercultural and interreligious dialogue….[but] To be authentic, dialogue must avoid yielding to relativism and syncretism and be animated by sincere respect for others and by a generous spirit of reconciliation and fraternity.
Thank God for one churchman who knows the difference between dialogue and compromise.
It would be interesting to present this in resolution form to GC.
Why can’t the Anglican Communion have a synodic leader of the godliness and quality of Pope Benedict?
Is it a ‘forlorn hope’ to expect the British Government to be able to name such a leader as the synodic head of the Anglican Communion?
#3, because the answer to your second question is, “Yes.”
How can we dialogue in a way that makes disciples when we are so poorly prepared to deal with the smallest challenge from the world?
Are we preparing our children for what they will face in the secular universities?