In the interval between the 57th and 58th Japanese general synods, the Primates’ Meeting, the Lambeth Conference, and the Anglican Consultative Council made “requests and recommendations” that the US and Canada forebear from pursuing gay bishops and blessings, while the “Archbishop of Canterbury has repeatedly given appeals and requests to address the problems.”
Yet, “in spite of the recommendations and appeals [TEC] and the [ACC] have proceeded with the ordination of a homosexual Bishop and recognising the ”˜marriage’ (union) of same sex couples, further complicating the situation and resulting in some provinces threatening to sever relations” with the two North American provinces, while other “provinces have expressed their intention of establishing a separate ”˜Province’.”
“These unfavourable movements have created the situation where a number of Provinces, Dioceses and Churches are unsure of where they stand, dangerously affecting their identity within the Anglican Communion,” Archbishop Uematsu warned.
Read it all (from the long queue of should-have-already-been-posted material)
I might not have expected Japan to issue this kind of sober warning, in addition to covenant adoption in the same spirit.
I believe Mexico, West Indies and now Japan have approved the revised Covenant. Although he criticizes the TEClub and ACoC for their unilateralism, his only criticism of the revised Covenant is the “un-Anglican-ness” of section four. He does not address the real problem – that the “Standing Committee” is stacked with TEClub lackeys. There is no provisional acceptance. (I didn’t expect there to be.) There will not be approve and improve the revised Covenant. It will be used as a weapon against the orthodox – even the Comm-conners like Tanzania, Burundi, and Sudan.
The covenant adopters — if the majority are GS — are hardly going to defer to a SC like the one claiming that role at present.
I’m afraid the headline on Global South Anglican overstates what Japan has done so far. I failed to post this story on The Living Church’s website in late December, but it appeared in the Jan. 16 issue: