Reason can be a corrective to the blind acceptance of certain religious beliefs and practices and atheists are correct to employ it in that service, particularly in the face of a growing fundamentalist mentality. But serious, thoughtful Christians do no less. They know that biblical scholarship can refine our understanding of the extent to which the Gospel accounts are meant to serve as recorded history and the extent to which they have been written to construe the key characters and events into the prophetic narratives of Old Testament texts. They accept that, eventually, forensic archaeology may help unravel important questions about the ultimate (human) fate of Jesus. And they encourage moral theologians in their continued speculation about the prescriptions for modern living that flow from the witness of Jesus’ life and death. Not to accept these things is to substitute the dead hand of dogma for a genuinely living faith.
But such a faith draws strength from its own internal consistency rather than historical or cultural attempts to articulate its detail. The internal consistency of Christianity was highlighted by the Kantian scholar Herbert James Paton in The Modern Predicament: A Study in the Philosophy of Religion, which was published in 1955. “It is hard to see why [people] should abandon the hope of immortality,” wrote Paton, “if their assumption of human freedom has led them to a belief in the goodness of God.” Again, this proves nothing but it captures a certain logic that only the truly irrational would deny.
Great to see this in a very secular mainstream newspaper.