(WSJ Ltrs) In response to Charlotte Allen–Will Assault on RFRAs Kill Conscientious Objection?

Ms. Allen’s article brings to mind another issue that I’m not sure many of those quick to condemn Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, and the citizens such acts seek to protect, have thought through””this country’s long-standing tradition of conscientious objection to compulsory military service.

The notion that government should not compel citizens to engage in behavior that they find morally objectionable on religious grounds has been honored in this country since its founding. The Supreme Court widened the definition of conscientious objector to include strongly held moral convictions not necessarily based on religious grounds. Perhaps Americans believe there will be no future need for the bad old days of conscription.

The “vengeful triumphalism among the progressive elites” over RFRAs signals a change in what many Americans believe their governments can require.

Read them all.

print

Posted in * Culture-Watch, Law & Legal Issues, Religion & Culture