The tone of the authors is fervent. They believe in experiential religion…
The purpose of religious language is not indicative, but expressive not to express a metaphysical fact but to express a valuation and evoke an attitude…
All the authors strenuously deny that it is literally true that a divine reality (i.e. the logos, preexistent Christ or Second Person of the Trinity) became man uniquely in Jesus Christ…
You may need to enlarge the page to see it better; I sure did; KSH.