Interesting that the editor didn’t have figures of actual attendance/actual giving for most of the provinces, but chose to do so for TEC and ACC and Brazil. Fun to play with numbers, isn’t it?
I think this must be a hoax. We all know the Africans are just one step removed from wearing loin clothes–at least that’s what the great anti-racists in TEC have said more than once. Not to mention, those African Archbishops don’t have time to spread the Gospel because all they do is spend their time jumping diocesan boundries–the greatest sin, specifically mentioned by Jesus in several Gospels. And I was at Minneapolis in 2003 and we were guaranteed that the election of VGR would cause the roles of TEC to swell. So, I say these numbers are just a big hoax.
I think it is interesting to see that Kenya pastors more official parishioners with 28 dioceses than TECUSA does with 111.
Interesting that the editor didn’t have figures of actual attendance/actual giving for most of the provinces, but chose to do so for TEC and ACC and Brazil. Fun to play with numbers, isn’t it?
ECUSA may have the lead in some category: small dioceses.
Reply to #2.
Bob,
when you look at the numbers, it’s easy to see that the numbers of Anglicans in Canada and the USA are relatively insignificant.
I think this must be a hoax. We all know the Africans are just one step removed from wearing loin clothes–at least that’s what the great anti-racists in TEC have said more than once. Not to mention, those African Archbishops don’t have time to spread the Gospel because all they do is spend their time jumping diocesan boundries–the greatest sin, specifically mentioned by Jesus in several Gospels. And I was at Minneapolis in 2003 and we were guaranteed that the election of VGR would cause the roles of TEC to swell. So, I say these numbers are just a big hoax.