On The Economy, Obama Gets Mixed Marks

The habit of assessing a president’s accomplishments after his first 100 days in office goes back to the first administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. In his first 100 days, Roosevelt laid the foundations for the New Deal. It’s an impossible standard to meet, says former Federal Reserve vice chairman Alan Blinder.

“I often say that Roosevelt cursed future presidents with the 100 days concept. … It’s just too short,” Blinder says.

In normal times, new presidents can’t hope to match Roosevelt’s accomplishments. In that regard, Obama has an advantage. These aren’t normal times. In fact, they’re the most challenging economic times since the Great Depression. So challenging, says Douglas Holtz-Eakin, John McCain’s former top economic adviser, that Obama began to influence economic policy even before he was inaugurated.

“This is the longest first hundred days, at least in my lifetime,” Holtz-Eakin says. “President Obama actually became the leader right after his election.”

Read it all.


Posted in * Economics, Politics, Economy, Office of the President, Politics in General, President Barack Obama, The Credit Freeze Crisis of Fall 2008/The Recession of 2007--, The U.S. Government, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

One comment on “On The Economy, Obama Gets Mixed Marks

  1. Dilbertnomore says:

    Mixed marks – yes, but he is doing quite well in his effort to move our free market capitalist economy in the direction of a European Socialist command guided economy. As he moves to attain greater control of industry – see GM as the model – the direction becomes more Fascist. For any who may think my use of these terms incendiary, I suggest you research the definitions of the terms I use. A good source is – http://www.econlib.org/library/CEECategory.html. You’ll find Socialism and Fascism under the blue banner – ‘Economic Systems’ – about 1/3 of the way down the page.

    Elections really do produce consequences. We are have the beginnings of ours now. Buckle up!