Bishop John Bickersteth: There are more suffragans than is healthy for the Church

It intrigues me that Church of England bishops seem to be regarded by the public today much as they were when I was consecrated to be one in 1970: namely as “a good thing for the country” at best, and at worst an amiable irrelevance. Perhaps this is because (as current polls suggest) most people still perceive themselves as believers in God.

None the less, I have come to the conclusion that too many bishops are being appointed for the health of the Church. As it is difficult for serving clergy to agree openly with this view (partly out of loyalty to their bishop, partly because some of them might become bishops themselves), I hope that among the million-or-so faithful in the pews, someone might ponder my argument.

A few statistics first:

1. In 1961, there were 13,500 full-time parochial clergy in our Church; currently there are 8616.

2. In 1961, there were the same number of dioceses as there are now, 44; so there were and are 44 diocesan bishops. But the number of suffragan/area/provincial bishops (all full-time) has grown from 44 in 1961 to 70 now. Thus there are now 114 bishops responsible for 9000 clergy, whereas, less than 50 years ago, there were 88 bishops shepherding 13,500 clergy.

Read it all.

print
Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, Anglican Provinces, Church of England (CoE), CoE Bishops

5 comments on “Bishop John Bickersteth: There are more suffragans than is healthy for the Church

  1. TomRightmyer says:

    The “read it all” leds to a subscription form.

  2. MKEnorthshore says:

    And this is somehow an important matter?

  3. Pageantmaster Ù† says:

    Well the purpose of lots of English bishops is to balance the ridiculous number of TEC bishops who swamp Lambeth, many of whom we would address as ‘Rector’ based on the numbers they count in their ‘dioceses’.

  4. Pageantmaster Ù† says:

    Domestically, I do have to say though that the expense and relevance of quite so many bishops is a common cause of complaint I come across from members and ex-members of the CofE in various parts of the country. It is not just the suffragans but the vast hordes of ‘advisers’ and functionaries who have been taken on at vast expense by burgeoning diocesan and deanery offices. This is while at parish level, the church is struggling to find the money for all these expensive superfluous people sometimes at the expense of their own ministry. I have had this quoted a number of times to me by people who have given up on the CofE! Perhaps we should take note?

  5. MargaretG says:

    I am pretty sure the statistics would look even worse for the TEC bishop to clergy ratio over time. Does someone have the figures?