We operate in an atmosphere of disbelief that seems Hegelian in its pursuit of truth. I’ve learned that nothing in the resolution is as it seems: “who is the author(s), what are they after, why did they choose that word, what’s the unstated ”“ and unanticipated ”“ consequence?”
For instance, a number of resolutions directly challenge B033 (the moratorium on ordinations [to the Episcopate] of non-celibate homosexual persons). Fine. Challenge it. However, there are even more resolutions which seek to effectively overturn, or supersede, B033 while technically leaving it as the official practice of the church. Here’s how it’s done: Several resolutions seek to ensure that “all the sacraments are available for all the baptized.” Sounds great. Who wouldn’t be for that? Until one realizes that this definition would allow me to ordain, or marry, a dog if I baptized it. Similarly, another resolution seeks to ensure that the ordination process is open to every baptized person. Again, to the eye this looks great, until you realize that the application would in practice contradict B033.
You know what I wish for? Honesty. A simple statement from the House of Deputies and House of Bishops outlining their beliefs and a willingness to address the implications of their honest convictions. No hiding behind clever resolutions. No shell games. No Three-card Monte. Simply say what you believe and let the chips fall where they may. I’m surrounded by men and women afraid to state without qualification what they believe, why they believe, and then stand on that belief.
Honesty has been a theme of mine for years. Here is just one of many, many examples:
Bearing false witness is not a minor matter, and I do not think the New Orleans statement–and this is in keeping with a widespread pattern over the last number of years–tells the truth. A church that does not tell the truth will not prosper–KSH.
The Rev. Canon Kendall Harmon, a deputy from the Diocese of South Carolina, raised concerns about what he called the clarity and honesty in A161.
“The Windsor Report uses clear language. This resolution doesn’t take the specific language of Windsor seriously enough,” he said. “We have been asked to place a moratorium; the timeframe is clear … yet the language we get is to exercise considerable caution — a fudge. Let’s be honest, let’s be clear.”
There can be little clarity or honesty when you do not know what you believe and are only trying to be informed by and respond to the values of the culture. This sad situation is to be expected.
I wonder if Integrity et al. can actually get an up or down vote on B033? Having won the day and having a clear path to enact whatever they want it would be a shame if they can’t take advantage of it. But it does seem that some are upset that the orthodox have left. It seems that winning is not enough for them.